« Professor Brain Responds To Professor Perronet | Main | Philadelphia Inquirer: Katrina Cottage “beautiful and livable” »
Sunday, February 05, 2006
A Resident Of The Gulf Shows How Ridiculous Architecture Has Become
I've never met Prof. Peronnet, but I'd bet real money that he thinks of himself and his work as liberal and socially progressive. Like many architecture professors, however, he shows a complete disdain for the wishes of the people for whom he's supposed to be working. His rant is an insult to the victims of Katrina.
I've known the author of the following e-mail for many years. She was born in Louisiana, lives on the Panhandle not far from Seaside, and volunteered for the Mississippi Renewal charrette.
She's handbuilt an amazing house on the Panhandle, entirely made from materials she's salvaged and recycled, without paying for either the materials or labor. She lives on an income that's a fraction of an architecture professor's salary.
The Katrins cottage — it feels good, it feels familiar, to a person raised in the South, does each generation have to reinvent themselves to be cool? We can learn from our ancestors, take the best from the past, treat it with respect and improve as tecnology gives us the tools to make things better.
Instead of Ranting during this overwhelming housing shortage why doesn't the Ranter build something, words are easy to put on a page but doors that open, windows that breath and beds to sleep in, that is a lot more complicated and takes commitment and hard work.
Why is a small Southern Cottage, the one that evoked the wrath of the writer, not considered to having the quality of being clever, original, and inventive? If he looked inside the Katrina cottage and saw how the space was used maximizing each square inch, he would see inventive. Would he be happier if there were no porches or no overhang, would it be better if it was flat roofed, like the many relief trailers, that leak, scattered through out Mississippi and Louisiana. What is the point? These designs have been proven to stand up to the wind, rain and heat, that all Southerns must deal with through out the year. i can tell you with out a doubt that here in the south we love our beautiful small buildings with porches so we can sit and enjoy summer afternoons, we like overhaning roofs, they sheds rain quickly and keep our windows dry in downpours, we like big windows for viewing tranquill gardens shaded by magnificent oaks,
As the author raves about burning a well built structure that will house a family of four and give a sense of home, where a fema trailer will be towed away in 18 months, it is a diservice to all the homeless people scattered through the South. Even the best Mobile homes, if you could get one, are particle board, aluminum, boxes, with the biggest change in 20 years, a 60 gallon garden tub, which most who live in these homes can hardly afford to heat the bath water. The mythological Phonix bird that was mentioned is said to have lived for six centuries in the Arabian desert, burning itself on a funeral pyre and rising from the ashes with renewed youth to live through another cycle. What about another cycle, longevity, still to this day you can hardly beat an arabian tent for comfortable desert living, what is wrong with designs that are tryed and true. Should good design not be respected for it's ability to span generations.
The Katrins cottage — it feels good, it feels familiar, to a person raised in the South, does each generation have to reinvent themselves to be cool? We can learn from our ancestors, take the best from the past, treat it with respect and improve as tecnology gives us the tools to make things better.
Instead of Ranting during this overwhelming housing shortage why doesn't the Ranter build something, words are easy to put on a page but doors that open, windows that breath and beds to sleep in, that is a lot more complicated and take commitment and hard work.... Leah
February 5, 2006 in Architecture, Culture, Current Affairs, Education, New Urbanism, Urbanism | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/11457/4197494
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A Resident Of The Gulf Shows How Ridiculous Architecture Has Become:
Comments
"But like many architecture professors, he shows a complete disdain for the wishes of the people for whom he's supposed to be working. His rant is an insult to the victims of Katrina."
Now was that called for?
Do you know me?
I was criticizing an architectural response and not a persons character. I of course believe that help of any sort that is given to the victims of disaster is good. I am also called as an architect and a professor to push into the unknown and try to redeem it. I am sorry you all take my rant so personally. If you choose to read the response to Professor Brian you might get a broader picture of my concern.
I am glad you have found pleasure in titles.
David J. Peronnet, RA
Assistant Professor
Department of Architecture
Hampton University
Posted by: David Peronnet, RA at Feb 9, 2006 9:33:04 PM
Professor Peronnet -
I begin by saying I don't know you. But in answer to your question, your words speak for themselves. And I believe those show a complete disdain for the Katrina victims.
Thousand of Mississippians love the cottage, and hope they can get one. Your response to their hope is "Stop the New Urbanist spew!!!"
Before you design something for them, you should listen to what they want, not just regurgitate architectural cliches from 1950.
Before you talk about New Urbanist spew and its lack of sustainability, you should do a little research — you know absolutely nothing about the sustainability of the cottages. You don't even know they're not trailers.
Before you get so violently abusive, why don't you point to a genuine alternative that is better? I don't believe there is one. You haven't provided one. That makes the phrase "push into the unknown and try to redeem it" meaningless, because you have done nothing other than complain about other people's work and hopes.
And "New Urbanist spew" isn't personal?
Posted by: john at Feb 9, 2006 10:47:55 PM
PS: Redeem means "compensate for the faults of (something)" — What makes you think the unknown needs to be "redeemed," exactly how is it that you plan to redeem it, and what does that have to do with the Katrina victims?
Posted by: john at Feb 9, 2006 11:27:33 PM
John,
Redemption does assume that we are not perfect and our methods will be strained by their inadaquate stregnth to solve all the worlds problems. The faults of something in the future is defined by the choices of the past. If poor choices involving community design and rebuilding is made today, choices that do not serve to heal or teach the disparity that was witnessed during the gulf coast disasters than what have we as licensed professionals done for the public we serve?
The New Urbanist mantra is that our current plan for living out our dreams is broken. That the sprawl of the suburbs has effectivly broken down the benefits of community. So by bringing working models of pleasentville to the surface and coating the United States in a false sense of security also gives a false sense of wellness to our nation and the truly desperate who need our help.
I am very sad that all types of people lost homes and property after Katrina, rita and the last five to ten hurricanes all the way back to Andrew. Many of whom have never left the FEMA trailer due to building costs. It also makes me very mad to see an out pour of response when it is comfortable for designers to saddle up and ride into disaster like super cowboys that give folks hope only for today and forget about the very real problem at home in our own cities caused by violence, fear and poverty. It is a well known fact, supported by the United Nations Commision on Refugees that disaster relief comes with many environmental problems that will last decades after the last cottage is deliverd. These future environmental and social problems of the future are those I seek to redeem as well as those presently aparent in our "old" urban places. The intent of quaint walkable community design is a moot point, how can I argue about feeling comfortable. Is that though the end all to our profession and my responsibility as an educator. What will the new urbanists due when the future of the cottages turns into the current symbol of a new urbanist elitism proved by the lack of signifigant diversity in any scheme to date. Not just diverity of skin color but of building style, economic classes, education levels, gender and family structure and many other diverse cultures that are being abandoned and left out to dry in the inner cities that the new urban suburbs surround.
Utimatly urban planning should stay in the urban jungle so those that cannot help but see despair, might see the cowboy on the hill who has come not just to rescue but to live with the desperate.
The following quote probably sums up my frustration.
"The active living movement supported the activities of new urbanism and smart growth. Urban planners advocating this approach to residential development suggest that transportation policy, neighborhood design, and existing land use patterns contribute to physical inactivity and the development of a culture of sedentary living. They call for a new approach to residential development that promotes high density neighborhoods and mixed land-use developments that bring residential, commercial, and retail activities closer together so that traffic is reduced and more cycling and walking is encouraged. Collectively, active living, new urbanism, and smart growth are constructing a new model of residential development that incorporates wellness into the design and construction of neighborhoods.
However, this essay argues that these movements are not only primarily based on conditions found in predominantly white middle-class central city and suburban communities, but also their advocates do not consider the significant differences that exist in dissimilar parts of the built environment. The point is that the barriers to active living found in distressed inner city neighborhoods are significantly different from those found in other parts of the metropolis. Here, built environment issues are more complex and challenging. Consequently, a distinct approach must be used to attack them. For example, in the inner city, barriers to active living and a healthy lifestyle are impeded by crime, violence, fear, inadequate food security, dilapidated housing, poorly maintained sidewalks, streets, sewer and water lines, and blight. These conditions create stressors that are produced by poverty, low-incomes, joblessness, difficult work situations, and the struggle to make ends meet, along with cultural and financial obstacles to health care. These built environment issues have produced a health crisis so severe that in December 2004, the NAACP said “the fight for quality health care is the new civil rights battle.”
Henry Louis Taylor, Jr., Ph.D
Dr. Taylor is a Professor in the Department of Urban and Regional Planning and
Director of the Center for Urban Studies at
University at Buffalo, New York
http://www.minority.unc.edu/sph/minconf/2005/keynoteabstract.htm
BTW: Thank you for caring about this issue and the welfare of the desperate. My hope is that you are true to the endgame of your principles what ever they are.
David
Posted by: David Peronnet, RA at Feb 10, 2006 7:00:16 AM
Dear Mr. Perronet,
I've read your post twice, but I don't understand what you are trying to say.
You present criticism I don't understand. I do understand that we are not perfect and that when we come out of the Ivory Tower and try to affect the greater world we may get some mud on our feet in the process. But I still don't see you presenting any solutions, which makes it easy to throw mud.
The principles of New Urbanism are here: http://www.cnu.org/cnu_reports/Charter.pdf I don't see how they relate to the fragment you present.
Posted by: john at Feb 10, 2006 11:32:38 AM

